Some interesting things we found for Fail to Reject Null Hypothesis
97%
Found this page helpful

Fail to Reject Null Hypothesis

Fail to rejext null hypothesis is something that is used in scientific methods. Many texts, and perhaps analysts, discuss "accepting" the null hypothesis as though they were stating that the null hypothesis were in fact true. Showing that the null hypothesis is true is not the same thing as failing to reject it. There is a relatively low probability (by construction) of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true (Type I error). But if we fail to reject the null hypothesis, what's the probability of it being true? Dallal provides an interesting discussion of how "failing to find an effect is different from showing there is no effect!"
Posted by joneicia on 8/22/2009
What others are suggesting
Statisticians will never accept the null hypothesis, we will fail to reject. In other words, we'll say that it isn't, or that we don't have enough evidence to say that it isn't, but we'll never say that it is, because someone else might come along with another sample which shows that it isn't and we don't want to be wrong.
www.richland.edu/james/lecture/m170/ch09-int.html
Null hypothesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In statistical hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H 0 ) formally describes some aspect of the statistical "behaviour" of a set of data. This description is assumed to be valid unless the act...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis
We would fail to reject the hypothesis if the interval contained 0. ... A Type II Error occurs when we fail to reject the null hypothesis when it is false. The probability of a type II error depends on the way the null hypothesis is false.
www.jerrydallal.com/LHSP/sigtest.htm
First...
www.umich.edu/~psycours/381/masuda/381notes/ch8/sld005.... www.umich.edu/~psycours/381/masuda/381notes/ch8/sld005.htm
between A and B. ... is statistically differ from ... Fail to reject null hypothesis = there is no significant statistical...
www.umich.edu/~psycours/381/masuda/381notes/ch8/tsld005... www.umich.edu/~psycours/381/masuda/381notes/ch8/tsld005.htm
 There is a relatively low probability (by construction) of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true (Type I error).  But if we fail to reject the null hypothesis, what’s the probability of it being true?
liesandstats.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/accept-the-null-h... liesandstats.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/accept-the-null-hypothesis-or-fail-to-reject-it/
It is common to perform experiments in which a 'success' is claimed when the null hypothesis is discarded. However, there is a category of experiment that has become important in which a success is when the null hypothesis is not rejected.
www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16595154
If our decision in a hypothesis test is to fail to reject the null hypothesis, then do we know that the null hypothesis must be true? ... No. When you fail to reject the null hypothesis, i . . . ( This answer is 57 words long)
www.usablestats.com/askstats/question/332/
Home > University > Social studies > Sociology > Social Theory > Why do psychologists 'fail to reject' rather than 'accept' a null hypothesis?
www.academicdb.com/Social_studies/Sociology/Social_Theo... www.academicdb.com/Social_studies/Sociology/Social_Theory/Why_do_psychologists__fail_to_reject__ra_L87802.html
The Blackboard - Where Climate Talk Gets Hot! ... Mind you, because the test described above is a statistical test, when I say we should reject the null hypothesis that the model mean is equal to the observed mean, I should be reporting the confidence level.
rankexploits.com/musings/2009/why-failure-to-reject-doe... rankexploits.com/musings/2009/why-failure-to-reject-doesnt-mean-much-type-2-error/
Can't find what you're looking for? Suggest a link.
Definition of
Fail
-v.i.
to be unsuccessful.
View full definition »
to
-prep.
as far as.
View full definition »
Reject
-v.t.
to refuse or discard.
View full definition »
Null
-adj.
of no effect.
View full definition »
Hypothesis
-n.
proposition set forth as an explanation of something, often as the basis for further investigation.
View full definition »