All that remains of the great cause of the State of Tennessee against the infidel Scopes is the formal business of bumping off the defendant. There may be some legal jousting on Monday and some gaudy oratory on Tuesday, but the main battle is over, ... Sickening Doubts About Publicity (June 29, 1925)
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/menk.h... www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/menk.htm
Bibilographic materials relating to the trial of John Scopes. ... Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1973. John Thomas Scopes, Plaintiff in Error, vs. State of TN, Defendant in Error, no. 2, Rhea County criminal docket: reply brief & argument for the state of TN. Nashville : 1925. Keebler, Robert S. The Tennessee Evolution Case.
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/SCO_BI... www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/SCO_BIBL.HTM
Scopes Trial - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Scopes Trial ( State v. Scopes , Scopes v. State, 152 Tenn. 424, 278 S.W. 57 (Tenn. 1926) , often called the " Scopes Monkey Trial ") was an American legal case that tested the Butler Act,...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial
Nevertheless, apparently Schofield did serve the Rule 1925(b) statement on the trial judge, who thereafter issued an opinion addressing the issues raised in the defendant's Rule 1925(b) statement. On appeal to the Pa.
hjbashman.blogspot.com/2006_02_01_archive.html
the cause was at the February term set for trial March 6, 1925; February 26th the jury was discharged because the court funds had become exhausted; March 7, 1925, defendant filed motion to dismiss the prosecution on the ground that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ok&vol=/ap... caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ok&vol=/appeals/1925/&invol=32463
By 1925, states across the South had passed laws prohibiting the teaching of evolution in the classroom. Oklahoma, Florida and Mississippi had such laws, and narrow margins determined those ... Across the courtroom at the defendant's table was Clarence Darrow, with a sharp criminal lawyer's mind and an infamous reputation.
xroads.virginia.edu/~UG97/inherit/1925home.html xroads.virginia.edu/~UG97/inherit/1925home.html
The Defendant BORMANN between 1925 and 1945 was: A member of the Nazi Party, member of the Reichstag, a member of the Staff of the Supreme Command of the SA, founder and head of "Hilfskasse der NSDAP, Reichsleiter, Chief of Staff Office of the Fuehrer's Deputy, head of the Party Chancery, Secretary of the Fuehrer,
avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/counta.asp
Defendant, from about 1925 until September 15, 1961, granted a 33 1/3% Discount in the price of gas sold to its employees who used gas for space heating. This discount was never included in the collective bargaining agreements.
www.altlaw.org/v1/cases/830619
17. When defendant was founded in 1925, under the corporate name Staley Milling Company, plaintiff was using Staley's as a trade-mark for foods and feeds on a national scale. ... 22. Defendant's first trade-mark for feeds was Four Bells, which it registered in the United States Patent Office in 1925.
www.altlaw.org/v1/cases/800948
Excalibur Group, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. City of Rochester, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant., 25 F.3d 1413 (8th Cir. 1994) ... Docket number: 93-1925;
vlex.com/vid/36098457
Definitions