A survey of the development of the New Testament over the first 4 centuries. ... Metzger, Bruce M. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1987. ISBN: 0198269544;
www.ntcanon.org/ www.ntcanon.org/
The Canon of Cyril of Jerusalem ~350 CE ... The Cheltenham Canon ~360 CE ... The Canon approved by the Synod of Laodicea ~363 CE ?
www.ntcanon.org/lists.shtml www.ntcanon.org/lists.shtml
Development of the New Testament canon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Biblical canon is the set of books Christians regard as divinely inspired and thus constituting the Christian Bible. Although the Early Church primarily used the Greek Old Testament, the Septuagin...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_New_Testament_... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_New_Testament_canon
However there was a time when the New Testament as a collection of writings did not exist. The development of the New Testament canon came about over a long process in the early centuries of the Christian Church. It was not produced at a specific point in time, nor was it decided on by one specific person or council.
www.ntgreek.org/SeminaryPapers/ChurchHistory/Criteria%2... www.ntgreek.org/SeminaryPapers/ChurchHistory/Criteria%20for%20Development%20of%20the%20NT%20Canon%20in%20First%20Four%20Centuries.pdf
Biblical canon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Biblical canon or canon of scripture is a list or set of Biblical books considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular religious community, generally in Judaism or Christianity. The...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon
This is a summary of the consensus of scholars on the formation of the New Testament, drawn from Bruce Metzger's far more detailed survey of the subject, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (Clarendon, 1987). All numbers in parentheses followed by "M" are pages in this text.
www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/NTcanon... www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/NTcanon.html
A chronology is now appropriate in order to present a sequence of events both biblical and extra-biblical which affect the canon of the Bible, both Old Testament and New Testament. It is said that no two scripture scholars will agree on one ... Developed a New Testament Canon (without 3 John, James or 2 Peter)
www.catholicapologetics.org/ap030600.htm
the Canon of Cyril of Jerusalem (ca. 350); the Cheltenham Canon (ca. 360); the Canon approved by the Synod of Laodicea (ca. 363?). The first to list the same 27 books as are now found in the New Testament is part of the 39th Festal Letter of Athanasius, published on Easter Sunday, 367.
www.mc.maricopa.edu/~tomshoemaker/handouts/nt-canon.htm... www.mc.maricopa.edu/~tomshoemaker/handouts/nt-canon.html
The Development of the New Testament Canon-The Rest of the Story: Polycarp of Smyrna ; (Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3) (Part 4) (Part 5) (Part 6) (Part 7) (Part 8) (This is Part 9) ... -- Text in brown: Epistle to the Phillipians by Polycarp; -- Text in Italics: Verses from the New Testament; -- Bible Translations:
www.xanga.com/LaleoCafe/436822746/item.html
In this stage of the historical development of the Canon of the New Testament we encounter for the first time a consciousness reflected in certain ecclesiastical writers, of the differences between the sacredcollections in divers sections of Christendom.
www.newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm www.newadvent.org/cathen/03274a.htm