What is the difference between utilitarianism and deontology? ... I think it would be easier if I were to answer your questions in reverse order and begin with the difference between utilitarian and deontological ethical theories. What they share in common is that they both attempt to provide answers to moral dilemmas.
www.philosophos.com/knowledge_base/archives_14/philosop... www.philosophos.com/knowledge_base/archives_14/philosophy_questions_1459.html
Deontological ethics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Source
Deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek , deon , "obligation, duty"; and , -logy|-logia ) is an approach to ethics that determines goodness or rightness from examining acts, rather than ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontological_ethics
Consequentialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Source
Consequentialism refers to those moral theories which hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action (or create a structure for judgme...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism
tually ought to do. This is a difference in content. The difference between logically consistent systems of deontology and utilitarianism need not be ...
www.springerlink.com/index/G1171MGM47G2V241.pdf
between the Scylla of deontology and the. Charybdis of utilitarianism. There is such a way. ..... tant differences between the two philosophers, the ...
www.springerlink.com/index/K604285L41413386.pdf
So what he illustrates in this model is the difference between a moral action done because of inclination, and a true moral action of the good will, which is done out of duty. Again, it is shown that the good will is good in itself, as are any of the actions that it wills. ... Kant vs. Mill: Deontology vs. Utilitarianism;
www.echeat.com/essay.php?t=28774
“
Deontological reasoning refers to duty, which is usually determined without regard to circumstances or consequences. Utilitarian reasoning always considers circumstances and consequences. A good case can be made that classic deontological t...
http://en.allexperts.com/q/Philosophy-1361/deontologica...
This led the American philosopher David Lyons to argue, in Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism 1965, that a plausible formulation of rule-utilitarianism would make it recommend the same actions as act-utilitarianism, so the two kinds are 'extensionally equivalent' and there is no practical difference between the two.
www.utilitarianism.com/ruleutil.htm www.utilitarianism.com/ruleutil.htm
Others argue that positive rights are logical correlates of negative rights because there is no moral difference between acts and omissions if the consequences are the same. ... Utilitarians understand that assessing anticipated consequences is very hard, and therefore prescriptive utilitarianism takes many forms (e.g.
www.elec.york.ac.uk/visual/jar11/ethics/rights.html
Deontology defines good or right conduct in terms of universality, duty, ... But utilitarianism will not only allow you to lie, ... There has come to be a difference in how the terms "Ethics" and "Morality" are used. There is also a difference between what makes for right conduct according to two basic sorts of morality.
personalethics.suite101.com/article.cfm/ethicsandmorali... personalethics.suite101.com/article.cfm/ethicsandmorality