Does creationism present a scientifically viable alternative to evolutionism? More specifically, should creationism be taught in the public school? It is my opinion that creationism is not a viable scientific alternative to evolution and hence creationism does not merit inclusion in the public school curriculum.
www.directionjournal.org/article/?450
By protecting the right and ability of students to learn science that is not molded by religious doctrine, we best fulfill the promise and purpose of the First Amendment. The theory of evolution is a fundamental concept of biology and it is supported by the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence. ... School Vouchers...
www.adl.org/issue_religious_freedom/create/creationism7... www.adl.org/issue_religious_freedom/create/creationism7.asp
Creation and evolution in public education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The status of creation and evolution in public education can be the subject of substantial debate in legal, political, and religious circles. The situation ranges from countries not allowing teacher...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_and_evolution_in_public_education
Radical evolutionists and biased Ohio newspapers have attempted to intimidate the uniformed by predicting that the public school’s science and technology programs will somehow become bankrupt if children are exposed to other valid theories (such as intelligent design) and evolution is not taught as fact.
www.creationists.org/patrickyoung/article06.html
Themes > Science > Life Sciences > Physical Anthropology > Evolution Should not be Taught as Fact > Reasons why Evolution Should not be Taught as Fact...
www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/sciences/lifescience/Physi... www.cartage.org.lb/en/themes/sciences/lifescience/PhysicalAnthropology/EvolutionFact/Reasons/Reasons.htm
The possibility of the evolution of the human body from other living materials is not a closed question. A Catholic could hold it, but he must also hold the two points above. Such evolution has not been proven, should not be taught as fact, and points for and against should be given.
www.catholic-forum.com/churches/cathteach/evolution_rat... www.catholic-forum.com/churches/cathteach/evolution_rationale.htm
The top administrator for the Taylor County School District raised some eyebrows Tuesday at a public hearing on the new science standards when he told state education officials that evolution should not be taught “as a fact.”...
www.palmbeachpost.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/palmbe... www.palmbeachpost.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/palmbeach/extracredit/entries/2008/01/09/taylor_county_schools_evolutio.html
High school students should have a grasp of the limitations that species face due to environmental factors such as the availability of food and water, specialization, ... Opposition to teaching evolution is based on the belief that evolution did not occur and that science's picture of the universe is misguided.
www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/09/21/evolution.enn/index.html www.cnn.com/2000/NATURE/09/21/evolution.enn/index.html
Here are some additional thoughts: Ephesians 5:11 teaches us to “expose the dangerous deeds of darkness.” I believe evolution is just that. In verse 12 it teaches us not to participate in them. Thus, we should be equipped to expose evolution and help our children to do so also.
www.creationdefense.org/32.htm
In my judgment, intelligent design should be taught in public schools as well as evolution. In fact, they should be discussed and ... Intelligent design should not be taught in public school if by definition the person proposing intelligent design means on faith alone a person must accept the existence of a universe...
www.helium.com/debates/107364-intelligent-design-should... www.helium.com/debates/107364-intelligent-design-should-not-be-taught-in-public-school