|
See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 17-18, n. 15 (1968). In some contexts, however, the Court has rejected the case-by-case approach to the "reasonableness" inquiry in favor of an approach that determines the reasonableness of contested practices in a categorical fashion.
|
www4.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0468_...
www4.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0468_0517_ZC.html
|
|
|
|
In Hudson v. Palmer, the Supreme Court sought to define the limits ofthe constitutional rights of prisoners. Toward that end, its decision tacitlyserved to instruct states and penal authorities in the constitutionally acceptable administration of justice in detention facilities.
|
law.jrank.org/pages/13047/Hudson-v-Palmer.html
law.jrank.org/pages/13047/Hudson-v-Palmer.html
|
|
|
In Hudson v. Palmer, the U.S. Supreme Court had to decide whether the Fourth Amendment protects prisoners in their jail cells ... Afterwards, Palmer filed a lawsuit against Hudson. He said Hudson searched his cell just to harass him. Palmer accused Hudson of destroying some ... Home > Supreme Court Drama > Hudson v. Palmer...
|
www.enotes.com/supreme-court-drama/hudson-v-palmer
www.enotes.com/supreme-court-drama/hudson-v-palmer
|
|
HUDSON v. PALMER ; CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ; No. 82-1630. Argued December 7, 1983. Decided July 3, 1984. * ; ... [ Footnote * ] Together with No. 82-6695, Palmer v. Hudson, also on certiorari to the same court.
|
www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?cite...
www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=431955
|
|
Hudson and another officer also charged Palmer with destroying state property after they discovered a ripped pillowcase near Palmer's cell bunk. Palmer was then ordered to reimburse the State.
|
www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_1630
|
|
The Court of Appeals concluded that the decision in Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U. S. 527 -- holding that a negligent deprivation of a prison inmate's property by state officials does not violate the Due Process ... US Supreme Court Center> US Supreme Court Cases & Opinions> Volume 468 > HUDSON V. PALMER, 468 U. S. 517 (1984)
|
supreme.justia.com/us/468/517/
|
|
Petitioner Hudson, a Louisiana prison inmate, ... by Dan Morales, Attorney General of Texas, Will Pryor, First Assistant Attorney General, Mary F. Keller, Deputy Attorney General, and Michael P. Hodge, Charles A. Palmer, Sharon Felfe, and Adrian L. Young, Assistant Attorneys General, joined by the Attorneys ... In Whitley v.
|
supreme.justia.com/us/503/1/case.html
|
|
decision in Hudson v. Palmer,6 some courts appeared willing to afford ...... claim. Indeed, Hudson v. Palmer may represent the Court's first full ...
|
www.jstor.org/stable/1143354
|
|
Ted S. HUDSON, Petitioner v. Russell Thomas PALMER, Jr. Russell Thomas PALMER, Jr., Petitioner v. Ted S. HUDSON. ... Palmer subsequently brought this pro se action in United States District Court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Respondent claimed that Hudson had conducted the shakedown search of his cell and had brought a...
|
openjurist.org/468/us/517
|
|
