Miller v. California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
Miller v. California , was an important United States Supreme Court case involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._California
|
|
|
MILLER v. CALIFORNI ... After a jury trial, he was convicted of violating California Penal Code § 311.2 (a), a misdemeanor, by knowingly distributing obscene matter, and the Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, summarily affirmed the judgment without opinion.
|
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/miller...
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/miller.html
|
|
|
|
Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity test formulated in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 418 (plurality opinion).
|
www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/miller.html
www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/miller.html
|
|
|
Miller test - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Miller test is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test
|
|
FindLaw | Find a Lawyer. Find Answers. ... MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) ... MILLER v. CALIFORNIA ; APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY ; OF ORANGE ; No. 70-73. Argued January 18-19, 1972 Reargued November 7, 1972 ; Decided June 21, 1973 ;
|
laws.findlaw.com/US/413/15.html
|
|
|
Miller, after conducting a mass mailing campaign to advertise the sale of "adult" material, was convicted of violating a California statute prohibiting the distribution of obscene material. Some unwilling recipients of Miller's brochures complained to the police, initiating the legal proceedings.
|
www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_73/
www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_73/
|
|
Secondary Link Miller v. California [Legal Information Institute] ... Samuel Rosenwein, A. L. Wirin, Fred Okrand, Laurence R. Sperber, Melvin L. Wulf, & Joel M. Gora filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California et al.
|
www.firstamendmentcenter.org/faclibrary/case.aspx?case=...
www.firstamendmentcenter.org/faclibrary/case.aspx?case=Miller_v_CA
|
|
For Miller: Attorneys for Miller argued that the California State law and its local application exceeded the guidelines of the Roth and Ginzburg decisions. There cannot be hundreds of interpretations of obscenity and pornography.
|
www.graves.k12.ky.us/schools/GCHS/bleonard/HTML/sc/mill...
www.graves.k12.ky.us/schools/GCHS/bleonard/HTML/sc/miller.htm
|
|
Marvin MILLER, Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA. ... Appellant was convicted of mailing unsolicited sexually explicit material in violation of a California statute that approximately incorporated the obscenity test formulated in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, ... (plurality opinion).
|
cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/dye4/medialib/docs/m...
cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/dye4/medialib/docs/miller.htm
|
|
