The Constitution reserves many rights for those suspected of crime. One of the fears of the Framers was that the government could act however it wished by simply saying an individual was ... These are also often referred to as the "Miranda rights." When you have been read your rights, you are said to have been "Mirandized."
www.usconstitution.net/miranda.html www.usconstitution.net/miranda.html
Police generally read these rights to individuals about to be questioned in custody. "You have the right to remain silent. If you give up the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. ...
http://www.abanet.org/publiced/practical/criminal/miran...
Miranda warning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Miranda warning is a warning given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody, or in a custodial situation, before they are interrogated. A custodial situation is one in...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning
Miranda rights. Miranda rights are given to anyone detained by the police informing them of their constitutional rights before being interrogated. ... Miranda Rights Law falls under the category of the Bill of Rights, specifically in the 5th Amendment Since 1966, after the Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona,
www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/mirandaRights.cfm www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/mirandaRights.cfm
Because the invocation of Miranda rights, particularly the right to counsel, has such an onerous impact on law enforcement's ability to conduct interrogations, recent court decisions have begun to impose some limitations on a custodial suspect's ability to invoke that right.3 Specifically, to ensure that a suspect...
www.emergency.com/miranda.htm www.emergency.com/miranda.htm
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- In one of the most important criminal law rulings in 34 years, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday reaffirmed a 1966 decision that ordered the police to inform criminal suspects of their Miranda rights during the arrest.
www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/06/26/miranda.01/ www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/06/26/miranda.01/
JIM LEHRER: Now, Gwen Ifill has the Miranda rights story. ... PAUL CASSELL: Well, as the court has repeatedly said about Miranda rights is that they're not constitutional rights. They're simply safeguards that the Court has created.
www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june00/miranda_1-6.html www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june00/miranda_1-6.html
Miranda: Rights of Silence ... The exact wording of the "Miranda Rights" statement is not specified in the Supreme Court's historic decision. Instead, law enforcement agencies have created a basic set of simple statements that can be read to accused persons prior to any questioning.
usgovinfo.about.com/cs/mirandarights/a/miranda_2.htm usgovinfo.about.com/cs/mirandarights/a/miranda_2.htm
On Monday, June 26, in a seven to two ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the constitutional basis behind Miranda Rights, thus requiring police and other law enforcement agents to continue administering them to individuals when being taken into custody.
speakout.com/activism/issue_briefs/1148b-1.html