|
Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908 ... On February 19, 1903, the legislature of the state of Oregon passed an act (Session Laws 1903, p. 148) the first section of which is in these words: ... We held in Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45, that a law providing that no laborer shall be required or permitted to work in bakeries...
|
www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/cases/muller.htm
www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/cases/muller.htm
|
|
|
|
Muller v. Oregon (1908 ... In 1903 Oregon passed a law limiting the number of hours a women could work in a laundry to ten a day. Laundry owner Curt Muller sued, claiming that the law was an unconstitutional violation of the "liberty to contract" of bakery owners and their employees.
|
www.pinzler.com/ushistory/mullervsupp.html
www.pinzler.com/ushistory/mullervsupp.html
|
|
|
|
; Oregon enacted a law that limited women to ten hours of work in factories and laundries. ... In a famous brief in defense of the Oregon law, attorney Louis Brandeis elaborately detailed expert reports on the harmful physical, economic and social effects of long working hours on women.
|
www.tangischools.org/schools/phs/think/court/muller.htm
www.tangischools.org/schools/phs/think/court/muller.htm
|
|
|
A trial resulted in a verdict against the defendant, who was sentenced to pay a fine of $10. The Supreme Court of the State affirmed the conviction, State v. Muller, 48 Oregon, 252, whereupon the case was brought here on writ of error.
|
www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Muller/
www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Muller/
|
|
OCP Home > Women Working Home > Browse > Dates and Events > Muller v. Oregon ... Muller v. Oregon (Supreme Court upholds maximum hour law), February 24, 1908 ... In Muller v. Oregon, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the governmental interest in protecting women's procreative value outweighed the "right" of women to have...
|
ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html
ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html
|
|
The ABA Division for Public Education presents a short discussion of Muller v. Oregon, focusing on regulation of the workplace, as part of its Key Supreme Court Cases online companion to Holt, Rhinehart & Winston's 'U.S. Supreme Court Case Studies' book. ... Muller v. Oregon (208 U.S. 412, 1908); Regulation of the...
|
www.abanet.org/publiced/youth/sia/holtcases/muller.html
www.abanet.org/publiced/youth/sia/holtcases/muller.html
|
|
State v. Muller, 48 Oregon, 252. The law operates unequally and unjustly, and does not affect equally and impartially all persons similarly situated, and is therefore class legislation. Cases cited supra and Bailey v. The People, 190 Illinois, 28;
|
www.larrydewitt.net/SSinGAPE/muller.htm
www.larrydewitt.net/SSinGAPE/muller.htm
|
|
The statute of Oregon of 1903 providing that no female shall work in certain establishments more than ten hour a day is not unconstitutional so far as respects laundries.
|
www.law.cornell.edu/supct-cgi/get-us-cite?208+412
|
|
MULLER v. STATE OF OREGON, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) ... CURT MULLER, Plff. in Err., v. STATE OF OREGON. No. 107. Argued January 15, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. ... On February 19, 1903, the legislature of the state of Oregon passed an act (Session Laws 1903, p. 148) the first section of which is in these words:
|
laws.findlaw.com/US/208/412.html
|
|
