|
A trial resulted in a verdict against the defendant, who was sentenced to pay a fine of $10. The Supreme Court of the State affirmed the conviction, State v. Muller, 48 Oregon, 252, whereupon the case was brought here on writ of error.
|
www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Muller/
www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Muller/
|
|
|
|
The right of a State to regulate the working hours of women rests on the police power and the right to preserve the health of the women of the State, and is not affected by other laws of the State granting or denying to women the same rights as to contract and the ... ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON...
|
www.law.cornell.edu/supct-cgi/get-us-cite/208/412
|
|
|
|
Hutchinson encyclopedia article about Muller V. State of Oregon. Muller V. State of Oregon. Information about Muller V. State of Oregon in the Hutchinson encyclopedia. ... Muller V. State of Oregon; Muller von Reichenstein; Müller von Reichenstein; Muller vs Oregon; Muller vs Oregon; Müller's Barbet; Müller's Bornean...
|
encyclopedia.farlex.com/Muller+V.+State+of+Oregon
encyclopedia.farlex.com/Muller+V.+State+of+Oregon
|
|
|
United States 1908 Muller v. State of Oregon was an influential Supreme Court decision that asserted the right of the government to limit the workday for women. Using social science evidence, Louis Brandeis argued before the Court that women who...
|
www.bookrags.com/Muller_v._Oregon
www.bookrags.com/Muller_v._Oregon
|
|
Muller V. State of Oregon | St. James Encyclopedia of Labor History Worldwide. Muller V. State of Oregon summary with 12 pages of encyclopedia entries, research information, and more. ... Search "Muller V. State of Oregon"
|
www.bookrags.com/research/muller-v-state-of-oregon-sjel...
www.bookrags.com/research/muller-v-state-of-oregon-sjel-01/
|
|
We held in Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 , 49 L. ed. 937, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. ... We have not referred in this discussion to the denial of the elective franchise in the state of Oregon, for while that may disclose a lack of political equality in all things with her brother, that is not of itself decisive.
|
www.blowthetrumpet.org/Mullerv.StateofOregon.htm
www.blowthetrumpet.org/Mullerv.StateofOregon.htm
|
|
MULLER v. STATE OF OREGON, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) ... CURT MULLER, Plff. in Err., v. STATE OF OREGON. No. 107. Argued January 15, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. ... On February 19, 1903, the legislature of the state of Oregon passed an act (Session Laws 1903, p. 148) the first section of which is in these words:
|
web.mit.edu/course/17/17.245/OldFiles/www/MullervOregon...
web.mit.edu/course/17/17.245/OldFiles/www/MullervOregon.htm
|
|
It is the law of Oregon that women, whether married or single, have equal contractual and personal rights with men. As said by Chief Justice Wolverton, in First Nat. Bank v. Leonard, 36 Or. 390, 396, 59 Pac. 873, 874, after a review of the various statutes of the state upon the subject:
|
www.altlaw.org/v1/cases/404553
www.altlaw.org/v1/cases/404553
|
|
OCP Home > Women Working Home > Browse > Dates and Events > Muller v. Oregon ... Women in industry: decision of the United States Supreme Court in Curt Muller vs. State of Oregon: upholding the constitutionality of the Oregon ten hour law for women and brief for the State of Oregon. New York: Reprinted by the National...
|
ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html
ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/events_muller.html
|
|
