Near v. Minnesota - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Near v. Minnesota , 283 U.S. 697 (1931), was a United States Supreme Court decision that recognized the freedom of the press from prior restraints on publication, a principle that was applied to fr...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_v._Minnesota
Among the most important and most frequently cited cases was Near vs. Minnesota of 1931. The state legislature had passed a law allowing the shutdown of a blatantly defamatory newspaper called the Saturday Press.
discovery.mnhs.org/MN150/index.php?title=Near_vs._Minne... discovery.mnhs.org/MN150/index.php?title=Near_vs._Minnesota
1. A Minnesota statute declares that one who engages "in the business of regularly and customarily producing, publishing," etc., "a malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper, magazine or other periodical," is guilty of a nuisance, and authorizes suits, in the name of the State, ... Thereupon, the defendant Near,
www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/near.html www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/comm/free_speech/near.html
; Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931) ... [A Minnesota statute allowed a court to shut down anyone "in the business of regularly and customarily producing, publishing....a malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspaper, magazine or other periodical." The Saturday Press was closed under the statute, ... Near v. Minnesota...
www.southernct.edu/~seymour/cases/near.htm www.southernct.edu/~seymour/cases/near.htm
Section 3: Near Vs. Minnesota; Near v. Minnesota/A History; The Court and Near; Why Near is Important; Robert R. McCormick; Near v. Minnesota/A History; This information is taken from Minnesota Rag by Fred W. Friendly.;
www.class.uh.edu/comm/classes/comm4303/section3/nearvsm... www.class.uh.edu/comm/classes/comm4303/section3/nearvsminnesota.html
Thereupon, the defendant Near, the present appellant, answered the complaint. He averred that he was the sole owner and proprietor of the publication in question. He admitted the publication of the articles in the issues described ... Chapter 285 of the Session Laws of Minnesota for the year 1925 provides for the abatement,
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/near.h... www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/near.html
1930s: Near v. Minnesota, 193 ... Near v. Minnesota, 1931 ; 51 Supreme Court Reporter, p. 625-639 ; (283 U.S. 697) ; NEAR V. STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. OLSON, CO. ATTY. Argued Jan. 30, 1930. Decided June 1, 1931. Mr. Chief Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the Court.
tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1930s/Near_vs_Minne... tucnak.fsv.cuni.cz/~calda/Documents/1930s/Near_vs_Minnesota_1935.html
Chief Justice Hughes delivered the opinion of the Court. ... If we cut through mere details of procedure, the operation and effect of the statute in substance is that public authorities may bring the owner or publisher of a newspaper or periodical before a judge upon a charge of conducting a business ... The struggle in England,
cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/dye4/medialib/docs/n... cwx.prenhall.com/bookbind/pubbooks/dye4/medialib/docs/near.htm
Near v. Minnesota; APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA; No. 91 Argued: January 30, 1931 --Decided: June 1, 1931 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court. ... Chapter 285 of the Session Laws of Minnesota for the year 1925 [n1] provides for the abatement, as a public nuisance,
www.scribd.com/doc/4664726/Consti2Near-vs-Minnesota www.scribd.com/doc/4664726/Consti2Near-vs-Minnesota
CLEVELAND(AP) LeBron James has taken plenty of hard hits in his career, but didn't like the one he took from Minnesota's Jason Collins on Friday night." ... LeBron James near triple double vs Minnesota Timberwolves March 27 2009 Cleveland Cavaliers Cavs...
youtube.com/?v=b-YS8kCPQsk youtube.com/?v=b-YS8kCPQsk