|
A priori and a posteriori - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The terms " a priori " and " a posteriori " are used in philosophy (epistemology) to distinguish two types of knowledge, justifications or arguments. A priori knowledge or justification ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_priori_and_a_posteriori |
|
|||
|
|||
|
An explanation of the a priori argument in the embodiment of divine revelation written by Henry C. Thiessen. ... We grant that this argument does not take us beyond the point of possibility, or, at the most, of probability. For although God is love and he exercises this attribute in the Godhead, apart from a...
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here’s an argument in favor of technical analysis based on support and resistance. Define “support and resistance” however you wish, as long as the definition has to do with price behavior driven by buyers and sellers.
|
|||
|
It then turns to a consent-based argument in favor of the death penalty, namely contractarianism. It argues that rational individuals in an antecedent position of choice would choose not to institute the penalty of death, even if they are primarily motivated by concern for their bodily security.
|
|||
|
The a priori/a posteriori distinction is sometimes applied to things other than ways of knowing, for instance, to propositions and arguments. An a priori proposition is one that is knowable a priori and an a priori argument is one the premises of which are a priori propositions.
|
|||
|
Now, let the reader, who has fully entered into the nature of the argument, ask himself this question :—Does he believe that such an engine has really been contrived, and what reasonable grounds has he for that belief?
|
Copyright © 2009, Dictionary.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Related Topics
