An argument has been raging for decades within the scientific and typographic communities on what seems a very insignificant issue: Do serifs contribute to the legibility of typefaces, and by definition, are sans serif typefaces less legible? ... Overview of legibility research: serif vs. sans serif...
www.alexpoole.info/academic/literaturereview.html
The KuraFire Network is the online home of Faruk Ateş, web standards evangelist at Apple Computer. ... Did your brief research throw up any actual recent tests or experiements that had approached the readability and accessibility issues around serif vs sans-serif?
kurafire.net/log/archive/2005/07/23/typography-serif-vs... kurafire.net/log/archive/2005/07/23/typography-serif-vs-sans-serif
INLS 181 Final Project ... On the whole, the researchers found that there was a neglible difference in the readability and legibility of serif vs. sans-serif fonts. In fact, the authors suggest that letter spacing may be more important than the presence of serifs in increasing legibility and readability (Arditi, Cho, 2005).
www.unc.edu/~jkullama/inls181/final/serif.html www.unc.edu/~jkullama/inls181/final/serif.html
Serif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In typography, serifs are semi-structural details on the ends of some of the strokes that make up letters and symbols. A typeface that has serifs is called a serif typeface (or seriffed typeface ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serif
Sans-serif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In typography, a sans-serif or sans serif typeface is one that does not have the small features called "serifs" at the end of strokes. The term comes from the Latin word sans , meaning "without"...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sans-serif
A. I would have to go with sans serif type. Of course they are both needed buti cant seem to think of a time i use serif except for body copy.….…. sans serifs are more fun to alter and i think there is more of a need for these faces.
typedesk.com/2006/01/18/serif-vs-sans-serif/ typedesk.com/2006/01/18/serif-vs-sans-serif/
The standard style for most content on the Web is sans serif fonts, such as Arial or Verdana. ... Serif fonts are used for titles and subtitles on many sites and that can lend a nice effect on heavily sans serif pages. But does it ever work to ... Blogs » Web Design » Serif Fonts Vs. Sans Serif Fonts: A Working Case Study...
www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/03/18/serif-fonts-vs-sans-... www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2009/03/18/serif-fonts-vs-sans-serif-fonts-a-working-case-study/
Readability between Serif and Sans Serif ... Readability of Sans Serif Fonts ... Sans Serif vs. Serif fonts...
www.wilsonweb.com/wmt6/html-email-fonts.htm
Sans Serif vs. Serif type faces; ... Sans serif typefaces, for the most part, are pure and clean in form. Most have an even stroke width which allows for an even gray color in text blocks. They are often easier to use since you don't have to worry as much about ligatures and fine kerning.
acg.media.mit.edu/courses/mas962/users/pcho/ps3/p1/inde... acg.media.mit.edu/courses/mas962/users/pcho/ps3/p1/index.html
In Typography: serif vs. sans-serif, Faruk Ateş talks about the pros and cons of serif and sans-serif typefaces on websites. ... It would be very interesting to know how the excellent anti-aliasing in today’s modern operating systems affect the legibility of serif vs. sans-serfi typefaces at various sizes.
www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200508/typography_serif_... www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200508/typography_serif_vs_sansserif/