|
As a first approximation we might suppose that the premise is the clause that follows the premise indicator, namely "the light of nature teaches us that fraud and deception necessarily proceed from some defect." But one might then consider that the substance of this claim is more simply that fraud and deception...
|
comp.uark.edu/~rlee/tools/idenargs.html
|
|
|
|
Since; Because for/for one thing for the reason that follows from inasmuch as as shown by given that seeing that owing to seeing that as/as indicated by assuming that considering that; ... Assuming that p, q = If p then q; Neither p nor q = Not (p or q), (Also,: not p and not q); Not both p and q = Not ... (A, M); 3.
|
www.mnsu.edu/philosophy/pdf/class/Argument_Info.pdf
|
|
|
Words that introduce or appear in an argument premise include: ... since (nontemporal meaning) as indicated by because for in that as (noncomparison meaning) ... may be inferred from given that seeing that for the reason that inasmuch as owing to...
|
academic.csuohio.edu/polen/LC9_Help/1/11pcindicators.ht...
academic.csuohio.edu/polen/LC9_Help/1/11pcindicators.htm
|
|
Fortunately, there are some pretty clear indicators you can trust: premise indicators and conclusion indicators. A premise indicator is a synonym for "because."
|
jan.ucc.nau.edu/~ghr/phi332/class/mod_2/top_2/
|
|
For example, consider the statement Because X, Y. Because is a premise indicator, so X is the premise for the conclusion Y. Consider the statement P therefore Q. Therefore is a conclusion indicator, so Q is the conclusion for premise P.
|
www.a-s.clayton.edu/barnett/indicator.html
www.a-s.clayton.edu/barnett/indicator.html
|
|
Premise indicators...
|
facstaff.elon.edu/batchelo/113/indicators.htm
facstaff.elon.edu/batchelo/113/indicators.htm
|
|
for, for the reason that, because ... since, due to, seeing that, given that ... Back to first slide...
|
campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/franklin.robins...
campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/franklin.robinson/presentations/proposition/tsld014.htm
|
|
An inductive argument, one premise of which is points out a likeness between two kinds of things. Based on the many similarities which are known to hold between the two, the presence of some additional feature in one thing leads to a conclusion that the other kind of thing shares that additional feature.
|
www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20110/110definition...
www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/courses/phil%20110/110definitions.htm
|
|
Sometimes students conclude that a specific passage is not and argument because they agree with the premise(s) and conclusion. ... Even though these indicator terms are not infallible guides, they can provide a useful test when you seek to identify conclusions and premises. Consider the following examples. "Mr.
|
faculty.uncfsu.edu/jyoung/argument.htm
|
|
